www.silverguide.site –

Royal commission investigates how to define antisemitism

The antisemitism royal commission is off to an early start this morning, crossing to Dr Dave Rich in London. He’s the policy director at the Community Security Trust, a charity that aims to protect Jewish people from terrorism, and has written an expert report on antisemitism.

He described antisemitism as “prejudice, discrimination, hostility or hatred towards Jewish people, Jewish organisations, Jewish institutions, or people perceived to be Jewish” that can manifest in both violent and non-violent ways.

He said:

Broadly speaking, it’s built on a set of negative stereotypes, attitudes and tropes about Jews.

He also took the commissioner through the long history of antisemitism, where those tropes (he particularly mentions the trope of Jews as greedy and stingy moneylenders) developed. For a thousand years, up to a 1965 papal decree that Jews were not permanently responsible for the death of Jesus Christ, Jews were frequently accused of being Christ killers, he said.

He also talked about the blood libel myth, entirely false and “bizarre” accusations that Jewish people committed infanticide against Christian children that have continued since the Holocaust, and the “ridiculous”, fraudulent and debunked Protocols of the Elders of Zion.

A more recent trope, he said, was that Jews were modern-day Nazis, showing how antisemitism adapted after the Holocaust.

Governments must define antisemitism in order to develop policies against it, he said.

Court to rule on ACCC case against Coles

Australians who shop at Coles are about to find out whether the federal court agrees that the supermarket intended to deceive them with “illusory” and “utterly misleading” discounts on many everyday products.

The federal court justice Michael O’Bryan will hand down his judgment this morning in the case the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) brought against Coles.

The ACCC accused Coles – and rival Woolworths – of temporarily hiking prices, then putting products on “sale” on their respective promotional programs, at prices that were higher than their previous long-term shelf price.

The ACCC alleges the supermarkets misled shoppers by using their “Down Down” and “Prices Dropped” and promotions to deliberately disguise price increases on hundreds of products between 2021 and 2023.

The Coles case, heard in the federal court in Melbourne in February, focused on a sample of about a dozen products, including Rexona deodorant, Arnott’s Shapes and 2L bottles of Coca-Cola.

During the trial, Coles conceded that by the time it raised the price of an item from the original to the “was” price, the supermarket had already planned and agreed with the supplier on what the third “Down Down” price would be.

Legal counsel for the supermarket, however, argued that the promotional prices were genuine discounts offered to shoppers after an increase in wholesale costs charged by suppliers during a period of rising inflation.

O’Bryan is expected to hand down his judgment at 9.30am. We’ll bring you more updates then

Updated

Angus Taylor says Coalition will ‘fight like hell’ to oppose budget tax changes

Angus Taylor, the opposition leader, said his rebuttal to the budget later tonight will be about putting Australians first, not about countering a surge in support for One Nation.

Taylor is speaking to Channel Seven’s Sunrise this morning, saying he plans to fight “every day” until the budget legislation gets to the parliament to “stop this from happening in the first place”. He went on:

We’ll be working with small businesses, with those who are trying to save a nest egg, because they’re going to get punished under this, those trying to grow a business, for those who are trying to buy a home or get ahead owning a home.

We’re going to be working with them to fight against this rotten legislation, a toxic set of taxes that are going to hurt aspirational Aussies and are an assault on aspiration.

He said the Coalition would “absolutely” do what’s necessary to repeal the changes to the capital gains tax discount if elected.

“Frankly, we’re going to fight like hell [against] this because this is an assault on aspiration,” Taylor said.

Good morning, Nick Visser here to pick up the blog. Let’s get to it.

PM expects productivity gains from CGT reforms

Albanese also said he expected productivity gains from the capital gains tax changes, arguing the current system “distorted the market towards housing away from equities”.

Investment won’t be distorted by the way the tax system operates, he said.

He said some of the negative reaction from the investor community has not been “based upon the policy” and he committed to consulting on the change.

Updated

PM denies housing and investment changes linked to new gen Z voters

The prime minister, Anthony Albanese, has said that the additional 700,000 gen Z voters being added to the electoral roll by the time of the next federal election were not a factor in deciding on the negative gearing and capital gains tax changes in Tuesday’s federal budget.

Asked by Sarah Ferguson on ABC’s 7.30 about the additional voters, Albanese said he only considered the merits of the policy change.

He said:

If you concentrate on good policy, the politics will look after itself.

What we’re concentrating on here is good policy in the interest of young Australians, but also in the interest of that social cohesion. In the national interest as well.

He said the government could not “sit back and continue to watch” income from labour treated differently to income from assets.

On deciding to grandfather existing negative gearing arrangements, Albanese was asked how he would explain to a young person that the negative gearing advantages are “locked in” for older generations now.

Albanese said negative gearing is still available for new builds, and the average time negative gearing operates is a little over five years because people either dispose of the property or it becomes positively geared.

He said the government is also making sure “we don’t change the basis of people who have gone into investing in a property, on the basis of arrangements that were made available to them”.

Updated

Welcome

Good morning and welcome to our live politics blog. I’m Martin Farrer with the top overnight stories and then Nick Visser will take the helm (with Krishani Dhanji ready to take over this afternoon in the lead-up to tonight’s budget reply speech from Angus Taylor).

Anthony Albanese has denied that the additional 700,000 gen Z voters being added to the electoral roll by the time of the next federal election was a factor in deciding on the negative gearing and capital gains tax changes in Tuesday’s federal budget. More coming up.

Australians who shop at Coles are about to find out whether the federal court agrees that the supermarket intended to deceive them with “illusory” and “utterly misleading” discounts on many everyday products. More details coming up.